The site was identified as important in 2015 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-crested Guan Penelope pileata | VU | resident | 2006 | 30 individuals | A1 |
Buff-browed Chachalaca Ortalis superciliaris | LC | resident | 2007 | 30 individuals | A1 |
Belem Curassow Crax pinima | CR | resident | - | present | A1 |
Black-winged Trumpeter Psophia obscura | CR | resident | - | present | A1 |
Eastern Red-necked Araçari Pteroglossus bitorquatus | EN | resident | - | present | A1 |
Pearly Parakeet Pyrrhura lepida | VU | resident | 2007 | 30 individuals | A1 |
Golden Parakeet Guaruba guarouba | VU | resident | 2006 | present | A1 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2015).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2017 | not assessed | high | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmin | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sarauá | Terra Indígena | 18,610 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Barreirinha | Terra Indígena | 2,374 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Tropical lowland evergreen forest | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Rio Capim. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/rio-capim-iba-brazil on 06/12/2023.