The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bean Goose Anser fabalis | LC | passage | 2007-2008 | 8,000 individuals | C3 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage | 2004-2009 | 1,500-3,000 individuals | C2 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | passage | 2005-2007 | 44 individuals | C1 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2010).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2010 | near favourable | very high | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Grus grus | Common Crane | 750 | 750 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Botaurus stellaris | Eurasian Bittern | 4 | 10 | males | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 1200 | 1200 | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | marine and freshwater aquaculture - subsistence/artisinal aquaculture | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | wood and pulp plantations (includes afforestation) - small-holder plantations | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - persecution/control | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | drought | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | habitat shifting and alteration | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | storms and floods | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | temperature extremes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | problematic native species/diseases - unspecified species | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
No known threats | no known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | agricultural & forestry effluents - type unknown/unrecorded | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | air-borne pollutants - type unknown/unrecorded | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Pollution | excess energy - noise pollution | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Olszyny Rakutowskie | Rezerwat Przyrody | 176 | protected area contained by site | 175 |
Jezioro Rakutowskie | Rezerwat Przyrody | 418 | protected area contained by site | 414 |
Gostynińsko-Włocławski Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 37,078 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Błota Rakutowskie | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 4,438 | protected area contains site | 4,395 |
Błota Kłócieńskie | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 3,899 | protected area overlaps with site | 3,887 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest | - |
Grassland | Humid grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | - |
Other | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Rakutowskie swamps. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/rakutowskie-swamps-iba-poland on 07/12/2023.