Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2010
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | breeding | 2008-2009 | 1-2 breeding pairs | C7 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2010 | low | unfavourable | medium |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Population |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - persecution/control | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - increase in fire frequency/intensity | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Condition of key/trigger populations (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific | Common | TargetPop | ActualPop | Units | Remaining | Result |
Aythya nyroca | Ferruginous Duck | 2 | 1 | breeding pairs | 50 | unfavourable |
Zapornia parva | Little Crake | 12 | 20 | males | 100 | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zbiornik Podedwórze | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 284 | protected area overlaps with site | 244 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Podedworze Reservoir. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 23/03/2023.