Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2010
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black Kite Milvus migrans | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 5-7 breeding pairs | C6 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2009 | very high | favourable | negligible |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Population |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | drought | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | renewable energy | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - unspecified species | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | problematic native species/diseases - unspecified species | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - increase in fire frequency/intensity | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
No known threats | no known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | agricultural & forestry effluents - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Pollution | garbage & solid waste | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Pollution | industrial & military effluents - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | shipping lanes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | utility & service lines | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | Mixed woodland | 200 | 200 | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | Mixed woodland | 400 | 400 | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Condition of key/trigger populations (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific | Common | TargetPop | ActualPop | Units | Remaining | Result |
Milvus migrans | 7 | 7 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zwierzyniec | Rezerwat Przyrody | 9 | protected area contained by site | 9 |
Stobrawski Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 60,486 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Łąki w okolicach Karłowic nad Stobrawą | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 933 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Łacha Jelcz | Rezerwat Przyrody | 60 | protected area contained by site | 7 |
Kanigóra | Rezerwat Przyrody | 6 | protected area contained by site | 5 |
Grodzisko Ryczyñskie | Nature Reserve | 2 | protected area contained by site | 2 |
Grodzisko Ryczyńskie | Rezerwat Przyrody | 2 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Grądy w Dolinie Odry | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 8,756 | protected area overlaps with site | 6,874 |
Grądy Odrzańskie | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 20,907 | protected area overlaps with site | 18,880 |
Dąbrowy Janikowskie | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 16 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | - |
Grassland | Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land, Ruderal land | - |
Other | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Oak-hornbeam forests in the Odra valley. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 07/07/2022.