Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2010
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population at site | IBA criteria triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 1999 | 540-700 males | C1, C6 |
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | LC | breeding | 1996-1999 | 50 males | C6 |
White Stork Ciconia ciconia | LC | breeding | 1996-1999 | 240-260 breeding pairs | C6 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 1999 | 62-70 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 1998-1999 | 360-380 breeding pairs | C2, C6 |
Western Marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus | LC | breeding | 1996-1999 | 71-85 breeding pairs | C6 |
Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus | LC | breeding | 1999 | 23-30 breeding pairs | C6 |
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis | LC | breeding | 1999 | 82 breeding pairs | C6 |
Note: The current IUCN Red List category may differ from the category that was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment.
For more information about the IBA criteria, please click here
IBA conservation status - summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | Threat (pressure) | Condition (state) | Action (response) |
2009 | very high | not assessed | low |
Was the whole site assessed? | no | Condition (state) assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | marine and freshwater aquaculture - subsistence/artisinal aquaculture | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - unspecified species | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | problematic native species/diseases - unspecified species | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
No known threats | no known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Pollution | excess energy - noise pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | utility & service lines | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Conservation actions taken at the site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wydma Moóo_ewska | Nature Reserve | 64 | protected area contained by site | 64 |
Wydma Mołożewska | Rezerwat Przyrody | 115 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Szwajcaria Podlaska | Rezerwat Przyrody | 24 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Skarpa Moóo_ewska | Nature Reserve | 2 | protected area contained by site | 2 |
Skarpa Mołożewska | Rezerwat Przyrody | 2 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Puszcza Biała | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 83,780 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Przekop | Rezerwat Przyrody | 21 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Podlaski Przóom Bugu | Landscape Park | 30,904 | protected area overlaps with site | 15,000 |
Park Krajobrazowy Podlaski Przełom Bugu | Park Krajobrazowy | 30,453 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Ostoja Nadliwiecka | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 13,623 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Ostoja Nadbużańska | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 46,037 | protected area overlaps with site | 42,501 |
Nadbużański Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 73,670 | protected area overlaps with site | 33,000 |
Nadbużański Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 23,183 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Nadbuÿañski Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | Protected Landscape Area | 55,300 | protected area overlaps with site | 17,500 |
Mokry Jegiel | Rezerwat Przyrody | 118 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Łęg Dębowy koło Janowa Podlaskiego | Rezerwat Przyrody | 132 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
L/êg Dêbowy | Nature Reserve | 133 | protected area contained by site | 133 |
Kózki | Rezerwat Przyrody | 86 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Kaliniak | Rezerwat Przyrody | 53 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Dolina Liwca | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 27,432 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Dolina Dolnego Bugu | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 74,310 | protected area overlaps with site | 73,380 |
Dolina Bugu i Nurca | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 3,728 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Dolina Bugu | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 30,153 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Dębniak | Rezerwat Przyrody | 21 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Bojarski Grąd | Rezerwat Przyrody | 8 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Grassland | Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation, Fens, transition mires and springs | - |
Other | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lower Bug river valley. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/951 on 11/06/2023.