Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2007
high
very unfavourable
low
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Population
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification
livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
likely in long term (beyond 4 years)
some of area/population (10-49%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
medium
Energy production and mining
renewable energy
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
slow but significant deterioration
high
Human intrusions and disturbance
recreational activities
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
high
Condition of key/trigger populations (state)
Scientific
Common
TargetPop
ActualPop
Units
Remaining
Result
Gavia arctica
Arctic Loon
15
5
breeding pairs
34
very unfavourable
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
10
5
breeding pairs
50
unfavourable
Haliaeetus albicilla
White-tailed Sea-eagle
1
1
breeding pairs
100
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)
A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive
Some limited conservation initiatives are in place
low
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
