Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2006
Populations of IBA trigger species| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greylag Goose Anser anser | LC | passage | 2005-2006 | 7,500-10,000 individuals | A4i |
| Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus | VU | passage | 2005-2006 | 200 individuals | A1, A4i |
| Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus | NT | passage | 2005-2006 | < 50 individuals | A1, A3 |
| Black Lark Melanocorypha yeltoniensis | LC | passage | 2005-2006 | 10,000 individuals | A3 |
| White-winged Lark Alauda leucoptera | LC | passage | 2005-2006 | 50-249 individuals | A3 |
| A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2005-2006 | 20,200 individuals | A4iii |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2006 | low | near favourable | not assessed |
| Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | Habitat |
| Accuracy of information | medium | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
| Grassland | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable | |
| Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable | |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
| IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Grassland | Humid, Steppes & dry calcareous | - |
| Wetlands (inland) | Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | - |
| Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|
| agriculture | - |
| hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2021) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Korgankol Lake. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 06/03/2021.
