Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Swamp Francolin Francolinus gularis | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-winged Duck Asarcornis scutulata | EN | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus | CR | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2003 | high | not assessed | not assessed |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Inner-Line Forest | Sanctuary | 10,000 | unknown | 0 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Innerline, Katakal and Barak Reserve Forests. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 17/08/2022.