Data Zone
The site was identified as important in 2022 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pectoral Antwren Herpsilochmus pectoralis | VU | resident | 2011-2022 | min 50 individuals | A1 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2022).
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
| 2022 | very unfavourable | high | negligible |
| Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | habitat | medium | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | Abandoned or fallow farmland, disturbed ground | 0 | 0 | very poor (< 40%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | Improved pasture land | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
| Forest | Tropical semi-evergreen forest | 0 | 0 | very poor (< 40%) | moderate (70-90%) | very unfavourable |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
| Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - increase in fire frequency/intensity | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
| Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
| Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Área De Relevante Interesse Ecológico Serra Do Orobó | Área de Relevante Interesse Ecológico | 7,399 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | Tropical semi-evergreen forest, Tropical deciduous forest | - |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | Improved pasture land, Abandoned or fallow farmland, disturbed ground | - |
| Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|
| rangeland/pastureland | - |
| forestry | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ibiquera / Ruy Barbosa. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ibiquera--ruy-barbosa-iba-brazil on 28/11/2023.
