Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2009
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor | EN | non-breeding | 2003 | present | A1, A4i |
Chinese Egret Egretta eulophotes | VU | non-breeding | 2003 | present | A1 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | winter | 2003 | present | A1, A4i |
Saunders's Gull Saundersilarus saundersi | VU | winter | 2003 | present | A1, A4i |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2010 | very high | unfavourable | medium |
Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | medium |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Neilingding-futian | Nature Reserve | 86,400 | protected area contains site | 304 |
Inner Deep Bay and Futian | National Nature Reserve | 815 | protected area contains site | 304 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Futian. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 25/06/2022.