Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger species| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red-necked Stint Calidris ruficollis | NT | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
| Dunlin Calidris alpina | LC | winter | 2003 | present | A4i |
| Terek Sandpiper Xenus cinereus | LC | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
| Grey-tailed Tattler Tringa brevipes | NT | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2015 | high | unfavourable | medium |
| Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | Habitat |
| Accuracy of information | - | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - intentional use: lg scale | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Geological events | earthquakes/tsunamis | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - sewage | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
| Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
| Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable | |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Some of site covered (10-49%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
| Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fujimae-higata | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 323 | protected area contained by site | 323 |
| Fujimae higata | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 770 | protected area overlaps with site | 770 |
| IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Marine Intertidal | - | |
| Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | Rice paddies | - |
| Marine Neritic | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Fujimae tidal flat. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 28/03/2023.
