The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chestnut-breasted Partridge Arborophila mandellii | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A3 |
White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2, A3 |
Hoary-throated Barwing Sibia nipalensis | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2, A3 |
Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Rusty-bellied Shortwing Brachypteryx hyperythra | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2004).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - named species | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fambong Lho | Sanctuary | 5,176 | protected area overlaps with site | 5,176 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Fambong Lho Wildlife Sanctuary - Himalayan Zoological Park - Ratey Chu Reserve Forest. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/fambong-lho-wildlife-sanctuary--himalayan-zoological-park--ratey-chu-reserve-forest-iba-india on 22/09/2023.