Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2018
very high
not assessed
negligible
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
-
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Human intrusions and disturbance
war, civil unrest and military exercises
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Shrubland
0
0
poor (40-69%)
poor (40-69%)
very unfavourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%)
No management planning has taken place
Very little or no conservation action taking place
negligible
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Land use
Land-use
Extent (% of site)
agriculture
-
rangeland/pastureland
-
urban/industrial/transport
-
fisheries/aquaculture
-
hunting
-
For further information about the land use classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Euphrates valley. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 31/03/2023.
