The site was identified as important in 2021 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps | LC | breeding | 2016-2021 | 91-101 mature individuals | B3a |
Magellanic Plover Pluvianellus socialis | NT | breeding | 2016-2021 | 1-31 individuals | B3a |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2021).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2015 | near favourable | high | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | 40000 | 40000 | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 5000 | 5000 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 45000 | 45000 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | oil and gas drilling | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Estancia San Gregorio. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/estancia-san-gregorio-iba-chile on 21/09/2023.