Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Sociable Lapwing Vanellus gregarius | CR | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2013 | very high | very unfavourable | medium |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | unknown |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | medium |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Dihaila Jheel and other wetlands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 24/03/2023.