Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population at site | IBA criteria triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asian Houbara Chlamydotis macqueenii | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps | CR | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-browed Bushchat Saxicola macrorhynchus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Note: The current IUCN Red List category may differ from the category that was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment.
For more information about the IBA criteria, please click here
IBA conservation status - summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | Threat (pressure) | Condition (state) | Action (response) |
2014 | high | favourable | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | yes | Condition (state) assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | renewable energy | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | problematic native species/diseases - named species | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of the site (state), by habitat | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Desert | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Shrubland | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at the site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Desert | National Park | 316,200 | protected area overlaps with site | 316,200 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Desert | - | |
Shrubland | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
energy production and mining | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Desert National Park. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/18347 on 03/06/2023.