Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2001
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population at site | IBA criteria triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violet Turaco Musophaga violacea | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Red-throated Bee-eater Merops bulocki | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Bearded Barbet Pogonornis dubius | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Senegal Parrot Poicephalus senegalus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Yellow-billed Shrike Lanius corvinus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Senegal Eremomela Eremomela pusilla | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Oriole Warbler Hypergerus atriceps | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
White-crowned Robin-chat Cossypha albicapillus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Heuglin's Masked Weaver Ploceus heuglini | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Note: The current IUCN Red List category may differ from the category that was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment.
For more information about the IBA criteria, please click here
IBA conservation status - summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | Threat (pressure) | Condition (state) | Action (response) |
2021 | very high | near favourable | high |
Was the whole site assessed? | yes | Condition (state) assessed by | habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - shifting agriculture | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - motivation unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - intentional use: subsistence/small scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | agricultural & forestry effluents - herbicides and pesticides | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - run-off | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of the site (state), by habitat | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Conservation actions taken at the site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bui | National Park | 182,060 | is identical to site | 18,210 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bui National Park. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/6335 on 30/05/2023.