Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2015
low
favourable
low
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - named species
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
low
Transportation and service corridors
flight paths
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Grassland
10000
10000
-
good (> 90%)
favourable
Wetlands (inland)
12000
12000
-
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)
No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun
Very little or no conservation action taking place
low
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Baker River Wetlands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 26/06/2022.
