Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2001
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Giant Coua Coua gigas | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A3 |
Coquerel's Coua Coua coquereli | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Henst's Goshawk Accipiter henstii | VU | resident | 1997 | present | A1 |
Appert's Tetraka Xanthomixis apperti | VU | resident | 1997 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Forest Rock-thrush Monticola sharpei | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A1, A2 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2017 | very high | near favourable | high |
Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - persecution/control | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - intentional use: subsistence/small scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - trend unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Other | other threat | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Mid-altitude forest - transitional | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
hunting | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Analavelona NPA. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 31/03/2023.