Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2006
low
favourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
good
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Residential and commercial development
housing and urban areas
likely in short term (within 4 years)
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Forest
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Grassland
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks)
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
No management planning has taken place
The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Land use
Land-use
Extent (% of site)
rangeland/pastureland
-
tourism/recreation
-
nature conservation and research
-
For further information about the land use classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Alaniya National Park. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 10/08/2022.