RU1384
Alaniya National Park


IBA Criteria

Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2008

Populations of IBA trigger species
Species Current IUCN Red List Category Season Year(s) of estimate Population estimate IBA Criteria Triggered
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus LC resident 1999 1,300 individuals A2, A3, B3
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi NT resident 1999 1,000 individuals A1, A2, A3, B2
Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus NT resident 1999 4 breeding pairs B2
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus LC resident 1999 3,000 breeding pairs A3
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria LC resident 1999 500 breeding pairs A3
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris LC resident 1999 3,000 breeding pairs A3
White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis LC resident 1999 50 breeding pairs A3
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla LC resident 1999 500-800 breeding pairs A3, B2

Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.

For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here


IBA Monitoring

Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment Threat score (pressure) Condition score (state) Action score (response)
2006 low favourable medium
Was the whole site covered? Yes State assessed by Habitat
Accuracy of information good

Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1 Threat Level 2 Timing Scope Severity Result
Residential and commercial development housing and urban areas likely in short term (within 4 years) small area/few individuals (<10%) slow but significant deterioration low

Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat Habitat Detail Reference Area (ha) Actual Area (ha) % of habitat remaining % of carrying capacity (overall) Result
Forest 0 0 good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable
Grassland 0 0 good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) 0 0 good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable

Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation Management Planning Conservation Action Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation No management planning has taken place The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here

IBA Protection

Protected Area Designation Area (ha) Relationship with IBA Overlap with IBA (ha)
Severo-Osetinsky Zapovednik 29,530 protected area is adjacent to site 0
Mineral'nyi istochnik Mosota Nature Monument 0 protected area overlaps with site 0
Karaugomskiy lednik Nature Monument 60 protected area overlaps with site 0
Kabardino-Balkarsky Zapovednik 82,507 protected area is adjacent to site 0
Fasnal'skiy sosnovyi bor Nature Monument 170 protected area overlaps with site 0
Dzinaginskaya sosnovaya polyana Nature Monument 9 protected area overlaps with site 0
Alania National Park 54,926 is identical to site 55,000

Habitats

IUCN Habitat Habitat detail Extent (% of site)
Forest -
Grassland Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland -
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) -
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.

Land use

Land-use Extent (% of site)
rangeland/pastureland -
tourism/recreation -
nature conservation and research -
For further information about the land use classification please click here.


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Alaniya National Park. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 10/08/2022.