Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population at site | IBA criteria triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis | VU | winter | 1995 | 90 individuals | A1, B2 |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | breeding | 2000 | 20 breeding pairs | A1 |
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | LC | breeding | - | 5-10 breeding pairs | B2 |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage | 2000 | 32 individuals | A1 |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | winter | 2002 | 224 individuals | A1 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding | 2000 | 45 breeding pairs | B2 |
Note: The current IUCN Red List category may differ from the category that was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment.
For more information about the IBA criteria, please click here
IBA conservation status - summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | Threat (pressure) | Condition (state) | Action (response) |
2016 | very high | unfavourable | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | yes | Condition (state) assessed by | habitat |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - abstraction of ground water (domestic use) | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | flight paths | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Condition of the site (state), by habitat | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at the site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terkos Lake | Wetland of Local Importance | 0 | is identical to site | 0 |
Kırklareli Kasatura Basin | Nature Protect Area | 0 | is identical to site | 0 |
Istanbul Catalca Cilingoz YHGS | Wildlife Development Area | 35,829 | is identical to site | 0 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Terkos Basin. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/9592 on 30/05/2023.