Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2018
medium
favourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
good
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Human intrusions and disturbance
recreational activities
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Residential and commercial development
housing and urban areas
likely in long term (beyond 4 years)
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Marine Coastal/Supratidal
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
near favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)
A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species
Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
