Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2013
very high
not assessed
negligible
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
unknown
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Biological resource use
hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target)
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%)
No management planning has taken place
Not assessed
negligible
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Land use
Land-use
Extent (% of site)
water management
-
urban/industrial/transport
-
agriculture
-
hunting
-
For further information about the land use classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Samara Wetlands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 01/04/2023.
