The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | EN | breeding | 1999 | 12-220 adults | A1, A4i |
Marbled Teal Marmaronetta angustirostris | NT | breeding | 1999 | 8-30 adults | A1, A4i |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2001).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2009 | favourable | medium | low |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Oxyura leucocephala | White-headed Duck | 12 | 73 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Climate change and severe weather | drought | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complexe des zones humides de barrage Ghédir El Golla et barrage El Mornaguia | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 273 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Complexe des zones humides de barrage Ghédir El Golla et barrage El Mornaguia | Wetland Zone of National Importance | 273 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Barrage Mornaguia | Game Reserve | 0 | protected area contains site | 148 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Artificial wetlands | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
hunting | - |
water management | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Barrage Mornaguia. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/barrage-mornaguia-iba-tunisia on 30/09/2023.