Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2001
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violet Turaco Musophaga violacea | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Red-throated Bee-eater Merops bulocki | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Bearded Barbet Pogonornis dubius | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Senegal Parrot Poicephalus senegalus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Yellow-billed Shrike Lanius corvinus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Senegal Eremomela Eremomela pusilla | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Oriole Warbler Hypergerus atriceps | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
White-crowned Robin-chat Cossypha albicapillus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Heuglin's Masked Weaver Ploceus heuglini | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2021 | very high | near favourable | high |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - shifting agriculture | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - motivation unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - intentional use: subsistence/small scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | agricultural & forestry effluents - herbicides and pesticides | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | domestic & urban waste water - run-off | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bui | National Park | 182,060 | is identical to site | 18,210 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Bui National Park. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 27/03/2023.