Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2009
high
favourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Population
Accuracy of information
good
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Biological resource use
fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - unintentional effects: large scale
likely in short term (within 4 years)
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
problematic native species/diseases - named species
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
low
Condition of key/trigger populations (state)
Scientific
Common
TargetPop
ActualPop
Units
Remaining
Result
Larus argentatus
150
16
nests
11
not assessed
Sterna dougallii
Roseate Tern
180
618
nests
100
favourable
Sterna hirundo
Common Tern
108
610
nests
100
favourable
Sterna paradisaea
Arctic Tern
2
89
nests
100
not assessed
Cepphus grylle
Black Guillemot
40
83
individuals
100
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun
Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
