Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2019
very high
not assessed
medium
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Biological resource use
hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target)
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Geological events
avalanches/landslides
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
high
Human intrusions and disturbance
work and other activities
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Residential and commercial development
housing and urban areas
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
high
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive
Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Gulf of Mottama. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 19/08/2022.
