Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2012
medium
favourable
low
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
poor
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Climate change and severe weather
habitat shifting and alteration
likely in long term (beyond 4 years)
some of area/population (10-49%)
no or imperceptible deterioration
low
Pollution
garbage & solid waste
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Sea
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
No management planning has taken place
Very little or no conservation action taking place
low
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Uracus Marine. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 27/03/2023.
