Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2010
very high
favourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Population
Accuracy of information
good
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - named species
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
problematic native species/diseases - named species
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Other
other threat
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Residential and commercial development
tourism and recreation areas
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Condition of key/trigger populations (state)
Scientific
Common
TargetPop
ActualPop
Units
Remaining
Result
Recurvirostra avosetta
Pied Avocet
1
1
breeding pairs
100
favourable
Cepphus grylle
Black Guillemot
1900
1900
individuals
100
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun
Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here