IBA Criteria

Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2019

Populations of IBA trigger species
Species Current IUCN Red List Category Season Year(s) of estimate Population estimate IBA Criteria Triggered
Chilean Tinamou Nothoprocta perdicaria LC resident 2015-2019 1-2 individuals A2
Chilean Pigeon Patagioenas araucana LC resident 2015-2019 1-2 individuals A2, A3
Chestnut-throated Huet-huet Pteroptochos castaneus LC resident 2015-2019 1-6 individuals A2
Ochre-flanked Tapaculo Eugralla paradoxa LC resident 2016-2019 1-4 adults A2, A3
Dusky Tapaculo Scytalopus fuscus LC resident 2015-2019 1-5 adults A3
White-throated Treerunner Pygarrhichas albogularis LC resident 2015-2019 1 individuals A3
Thorn-tailed Rayadito Aphrastura spinicauda LC resident 2015-2019 1-2 individuals A3
Des Murs's Wiretail Sylviorthorhynchus desmurii LC resident 2016-2019 1-2 individuals A3
Dusky-tailed Canastero Pseudasthenes humicola LC resident 2015-2019 1-5 individuals A2
Patagonian Tyrant Colorhamphus parvirostris LC non-breeding 2015-2019 1-5 individuals A3
Fire-eyed Diucon Xolmis pyrope LC resident 2015-2019 1-8 individuals A3
Chilean Mockingbird Mimus thenca LC resident 2010 present A2
Chilean Mockingbird Mimus thenca LC resident 2015-2019 1-4 individuals A2

Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.

For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here

IBA Monitoring

Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment Threat score (pressure) Condition score (state) Action score (response)
2019 medium unfavourable medium
Was the whole site covered? No State assessed by Habitat
Accuracy of information good

Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1 Threat Level 2 Timing Scope Severity Result
Human intrusions and disturbance recreational activities happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Human intrusions and disturbance work and other activities likely in long term (beyond 4 years) some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration medium

Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat Habitat Detail Reference Area (ha) Actual Area (ha) % of habitat remaining % of carrying capacity (overall) Result
Grassland Low, seasonally wet grassland 0 0 moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Marine Coastal/Supratidal 0 0 moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Wetlands (inland) Freshwater marshes/swamps 0 0 good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable

Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation Management Planning Conservation Action Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here


IUCN Habitat Habitat detail Extent (% of site)
Marine Coastal/Supratidal -
Wetlands (inland) Freshwater marshes/swamps -
Grassland Low, seasonally wet grassland -
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.

Land use

Land-use Extent (% of site)
rangeland/pastureland -
forestry -
For further information about the land use classification please click here.

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Putu. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 09/02/2023.