The site was identified as important in 2019 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | non-breeding | 2015-2019 | 18-95 individuals | B1a |
Peruvian Pelican Pelecanus thagus | NT | resident | 2015-2019 | 6-380 individuals | B1a |
Grey Gull Larus modestus | LC | non-breeding | 2015-2019 | 30-991 individuals | A4, B3a |
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans | NT | non-breeding | 2015-2019 | 25-176 individuals | B1a |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2019).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2019 | favourable | very high | low |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | wood and pulp plantations (includes afforestation) - agro-industry plantations | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Humedal de Reloca | Santuario de la Naturaleza | 394 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Federico Albert | Reserva Forestal | 145 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Introduced vegetation | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools, Rivers | - |
Shrubland | Scrub | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
not utilised | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Santuario de la Naturaleza Humedal Laguna Reloca. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/santuario-de-la-naturaleza-humedal-laguna-reloca-iba-chile on 28/11/2023.