Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2010
Populations of IBA trigger species| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | passage | 2008-2009 | 7,500-9,900 individuals | C5 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2010 | low | not assessed | low |
| Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
| Accuracy of information | medium | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Energy production and mining | renewable energy | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Transportation and service corridors | utility & service lines | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Not assessed | low |
| Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zatoka Pucka i Półwysep Helski | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 26,566 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Zatoka Pucka | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 62,430 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Zatoka Pucka | Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) | 18,804 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Słone Łąki | Rezerwat Przyrody | 29 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Nadmorski Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 17,828 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| Kaszubskie Klify | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 228 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
| Helskie Wydmy | Rezerwat Przyrody | 108 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Hel Peninsula. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 23/03/2023.
