The site was identified as important in 2020 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Southern Rockhopper Penguin Eudyptes chrysocome | VU | resident | 2016-2020 | 301 individuals | A1 |
Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus | LC | resident | 2016-2020 | 67-1,110 individuals | B1a |
Sooty Shearwater Ardenna grisea | NT | breeding | 2016-2020 | 1,000-100,000 individuals | B1a |
Striated Caracara Phalcoboenus australis | NT | resident | 2006 | present | A1, A2 |
Black Cinclodes Cinclodes maculirostris | NT | resident | 2008 | present | A2 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2020).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2015 | favourable | low | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | 45000 | 45000 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 10700 | 10700 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 5000 | 5000 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cabo de Hornos | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 4,893,500 | protected area contains site | 0 |
Cabo de Hornos | Parque Nacional | 58,917 | protected area overlaps with site | 63,093 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | - | |
Grassland | Southern temperate grassland | - |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Parque Nacional Cabo de Hornos. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/parque-nacional-cabo-de-hornos-iba-chile on 05/12/2023.