Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2021
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | resident | 2012-2019 | min 191 individuals | B1a |
Red-legged Cormorant Poikilocarbo gaimardi | NT | resident | 2016-2021 | 850 individuals | A4, B1a, B3a |
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus | LC | non-breeding | 2008 | min 400 individuals | B3a |
Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica | LC | non-breeding | 2016-2021 | 800-1,500 individuals | A4, B3a |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2015 | high | unfavourable | negligible |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | renewable energy | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Grassland | 225 | 225 | - | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 124 | 124 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Marine Intertidal | 225 | 225 | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Grassland | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Sistema Quetalmahue, Quilo y Mar Brava. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 25/03/2023.