Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2012
very high
not assessed
not assessed
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
-
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Energy production and mining
mining and quarrying
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
slow but significant deterioration
medium
Human intrusions and disturbance
recreational activities
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes
introduced genetic material
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Natural system modifications
dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown)
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
high
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
not assessed
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Upper Vistula River Valley. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 22/03/2023.
