Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2016
low
favourable
negligible
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Residential and commercial development
tourism and recreation areas
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Wetlands (inland)
Standing freshwater
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%)
No management planning has taken place
Some limited conservation initiatives are in place
negligible
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Keban Islands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 22/01/2022.
