Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2007
low
very unfavourable
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Population
Accuracy of information
good
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification
livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Natural system modifications
dams & water management/use - abstraction of surface water (unknown use)
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Pollution
domestic & urban waste water - sewage
happening now
small area/few individuals (<10%)
slow but significant deterioration
low
Condition of key/trigger populations (state)
Scientific
Common
TargetPop
ActualPop
Units
Remaining
Result
Cygnus columbianus
Tundra Swan
71
44
individuals
62
unfavourable
Calidris pugnax
Ruff
99
27
individuals
28
very unfavourable
Species group - waterbirds
A4iii
37776
13337
individuals
36
very unfavourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive
Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
