• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004

Populations of IBA trigger species

Species	Current IUCN Red List Category	Season	Year(s) of estimate	Population estimate	IBA Criteria Triggered
Pin-tailed Sandgrouse Pterocles alchata	LC	breeding	2000	20-30 breeding pairs	B2
Little Swift Apus affinis	LC	breeding	-	150 breeding pairs	B2
Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus eremita	EN	breeding	2002	55 individuals	A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus	LC	non-breeding	2001	550 individuals	A1, B1i
Pallid Scops-owl Otus brucei	LC	breeding	-	1-5 breeding pairs	B2
Pied Kingfisher Ceryle rudis	LC	breeding	-	5-10 breeding pairs	B2
Graceful Prinia Prinia gracilis	LC	breeding	-	20 breeding pairs	B2
Trumpeter Finch Bucanetes githagineus	LC	breeding	-	5-20 breeding pairs	B2
Cinereous Bunting Emberiza cineracea	NT	breeding	2001	50 breeding pairs	A1, B2

Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.

For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here

Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1	Threat Level 2	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Biological resource use	hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - motivation unknown/unrecorded	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Energy production and mining	mining and quarrying	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low
Natural system modifications	dams & water management/use - large dams	past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	very rapid to severe deterioration	low

Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat	Habitat Detail	Reference Area (ha)	Actual Area (ha)	% of habitat remaining	% of carrying capacity (overall)	Result
Desert	Semidesert	0	0	moderate (70-90%)	good (> 90%)	near favourable

Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation	Management Planning	Conservation Action	Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%)	A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive	Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity	low

For more information about IBA monitoring please click here

Protected Area	Designation	Area (ha)	Relationship with IBA	Overlap with IBA (ha)
Birecik Lake Wetland	Other Area	0	protected area contained by site	0
Birecik Firat YHGS	Wildlife Development Area	0	unknown	0

The local conservation groups below are working to support conservation at this IBA.

Name	Year formed
Doğa Kültür ve Yaşatma Derneği	2011

For more information on BirdLife's work with Local conservation groups please click here.

IUCN Habitat	Habitat detail	Extent (% of site)
Desert	Semidesert	-
Wetlands (inland)	Rivers and streams	-
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine		-
Artificial/Terrestrial	Arable land, Urban parks and gardens	-

For further information about the habitat classification please click here.

Land-use	Extent (% of site)
agriculture	-
energy production and mining	-
tourism/recreation	-

For further information about the land use classification please click here.

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Southern Euphrates Valley and Birecik Plains. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 14/08/2022.