Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2004
Populations of IBA trigger species| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caspian Snowcock Tetraogallus caspius | LC | breeding | - | 80 breeding pairs | A3, B2 |
| Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus | NT | breeding | - | 10-20 breeding pairs | B2 |
| Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos | LC | breeding | - | 20-30 breeding pairs | B2 |
| Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | breeding | - | abundant | A3 |
| Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | breeding | - | abundant | A3 |
| Semi-collared Flycatcher Ficedula semitorquata | LC | breeding | - | 100 breeding pairs | B2 |
| Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | breeding | - | abundant | A3 |
| White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis | LC | breeding | - | abundant | A3 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2016 | very high | very unfavourable | low |
| Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
| Accuracy of information | medium | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
| Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown) | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
| Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
| Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | 0 | 0 | poor (40-69%) | moderate (70-90%) | very unfavourable |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
| IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | - |
| Shrubland | - | |
| Grassland | - | |
| Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Munzur Mountains. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 21/03/2023.
