Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2007
high
near favourable
low
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
Habitat
Accuracy of information
-
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Biological resource use
hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target)
happening now
some of area/population (10-49%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
high
Human intrusions and disturbance
recreational activities
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
slow but significant deterioration
high
Residential and commercial development
housing and urban areas
likely in short term (within 4 years)
some of area/population (10-49%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
high
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Artificial/Terrestrial
0
0
good (> 90%)
moderate (70-90%)
near favourable
Forest
0
0
good (> 90%)
moderate (70-90%)
near favourable
Grassland
0
0
good (> 90%)
moderate (70-90%)
near favourable
Wetlands (inland)
0
0
good (> 90%)
good (> 90%)
favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)
No management planning has taken place
Some limited conservation initiatives are in place
low
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
