The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | non-breeding | 2003-2006 | 1-5 individuals | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | passage | 2003-2006 | 50 individuals | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | breeding | 2006-2007 | 35-50 breeding pairs | A1 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2008).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2007 | unfavourable | very high | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Falco naumanni | Lesser Kestrel | 80 | 35 | breeding pairs | 44 | unfavourable |
Pastor roseus | Rosy Starling | 1000 | 50 | breeding pairs | 5 | not assessed |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | agricultural & forestry effluents - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | commercial and industrial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kayakentskiy | Zakaznik | 23,700 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | - | |
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | - |
Desert | Semidesert | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Urban parks and gardens | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | - |
agriculture | - |
hunting | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Valley of Bashlychai river. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/valley-of-bashlychai-river-iba-russia-(european) on 04/10/2023.