The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 1981-2006 | 1-3 breeding pairs | A3 |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | resident | 1981-1997 | 1-3 breeding pairs | A1 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | breeding | 2006 | 1 | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident | 1981-2006 | 2-9 breeding pairs | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | breeding | 2006 | 1 | A3 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2008).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2006 | favourable | low | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ozero Kezenoj-Am (Ejzenam) | Nature Monument | 170 | protected area contained by site | 170 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | - |
agriculture | - |
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Kezenoi-Am lake. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/kezenoi-am-lake-iba-russia-(european) on 05/12/2023.