Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2010
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2001-2008 | 56-64 males | C1 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2010 | high | very unfavourable | low |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | marine and freshwater aquaculture - subsistence/artisinal aquaculture | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Climate change and severe weather | drought | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | habitat shifting and alteration | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - dams (size unknown) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - increase in fire frequency/intensity | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | excess energy - noise pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | garbage & solid waste | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | commercial and industrial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | tourism and recreation areas | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | utility & service lines | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable | |
Grassland | 0 | 0 | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wymięklizna | Rezerwat Przyrody | 63 | protected area contained by site | 0 |
Warszawski | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 152,477 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
Ostoja Bagno Całowanie | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 3,448 | protected area overlaps with site | 2,967 |
Nadwiślański (powiat garwoliński, miński i otwocki) | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 69,962 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Na Torfach im. Janusza Kozłowskiego | Rezerwat Przyrody | 21 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Mazowiecki Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy | 15,755 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Bagno Całowanie | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 4,215 | protected area overlaps with site | 3,800 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Calowanie Swamp. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 08/02/2023.