Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2008
Populations of IBA trigger species| Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | passage | 2006 | 100 individuals | A1 |
| Sociable Lapwing Vanellus gregarius | CR | passage | 2006 | 16 individuals | A1 |
| Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | passage | 2006 | 100-400 individuals | A1 |
| Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 2003-2007 | 50-300 individuals | A1 |
| Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | breeding | 2006-2007 | 10-12 breeding pairs | A1 |
| A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | - | 2003-2006 | 3,000-10,000 individuals | B1iv |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2006 | medium | near favourable | negligible |
| Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
| Accuracy of information | medium | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
| Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
| Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
| Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable | |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
| IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | - | |
| Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | - |
| Desert | Semidesert | - |
| Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | - |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Other urban and industrial areas, Ruderal land | - |
| Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|
| agriculture | - |
| rangeland/pastureland | - |
| urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Krasnoarmeiskiye waste lands. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 10/08/2022.
