Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2006
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 30-50 individuals | A3 |
Goosander Mergus merganser | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 300-500 breeding pairs | A4i |
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | passage | 2000-2006 | 500-1,500 individuals | A4i |
Snow Pigeon Columba leuconota | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 1 individuals | A3 |
Ibisbill Ibidorhyncha struthersii | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 2-4 breeding pairs | A3 |
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis | NT | resident | 2000-2006 | 4-8 breeding pairs | A3 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | breeding | 2000-2006 | max 2 breeding pairs | A1 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 30-45 breeding pairs | A3 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 15-30 breeding pairs | A3 |
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 12-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 12-16 breeding pairs | A3 |
Himalayan Rubythroat Calliope pectoralis | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 6-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 12-18 breeding pairs | A3 |
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 6-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 8-14 breeding pairs | A3 |
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 10-16 breeding pairs | A3 |
White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 16-25 breeding pairs | A3 |
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 10-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Red-mantled Rosefinch Carpodacus rhodochlamys | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 6-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | resident | 2000-2005 | 14-20 breeding pairs | A3 |
Red-fronted Rosefinch Carpodacus puniceus | LC | breeding | 2000-2006 | 4-8 breeding pairs | A3 |
Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 10-20 breeding pairs | A3 |
Plain Mountain-finch Leucosticte nemoricola | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 15-25 breeding pairs | A3 |
Brandt's Mountain-finch Leucosticte brandti | LC | resident | 2000-2006 | 20-30 breeding pairs | A3 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2006 | very high | not assessed | low |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Not assessed | low |
Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Таджикский Национальный парк | Национальный парк | 260,000 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Desert | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Drumkul Lake. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 25/03/2023.