Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2017
very high
very unfavourable
low
Was the whole site covered?
No
State assessed by
Population
Accuracy of information
medium
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Climate change and severe weather
habitat shifting and alteration
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
very high
Energy production and mining
renewable energy
happening now
whole area/population (>90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Human intrusions and disturbance
work and other activities
likely in long term (beyond 4 years)
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
moderate to rapid deterioration
medium
Natural system modifications
dams & water management/use - abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)
happening now
majority/most of area/population (50-90%)
very rapid to severe deterioration
very high
Condition of key/trigger populations (state)
Scientific
Common
TargetPop
ActualPop
Units
Remaining
Result
Anser anser
Greylag Goose
130
130
breeding pairs
100
favourable
Anas crecca
25000
3000
breeding pairs
12
very unfavourable
Fulica atra
Common Coot
2000
2000
breeding pairs
100
favourable
Plegadis falcinellus
Glossy Ibis
810
310
breeding pairs
39
very unfavourable
Nycticorax nycticorax
Black-crowned Night-heron
1750
200
breeding pairs
12
very unfavourable
Ardea purpurea
Purple Heron
125
100
breeding pairs
80
near favourable
Ardea alba
Great White Egret
220
110
breeding pairs
50
unfavourable
Phalacrocorax carbo
Great Cormorant
2500
2000
breeding pairs
80
near favourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)
A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive
Very little or no conservation action taking place
low
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation
-
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Land use
Land-use
Extent (% of site)
agriculture
-
fisheries/aquaculture
-
water management
-
For further information about the land use classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Dnister delta. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 04/02/2023.