Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2006
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | EN | passage | 2006 | 10-200 adults | A1, A4i |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | winter | 2006 | 10-150 adults | A1 |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | breeding | 2006 | 25-350 adults | A4i |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | passage | 2006 | 3-40 adults | A1 |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage | 2006 | 50-1,500 adults | A4i |
Slender-billed Gull Larus genei | LC | passage | 2006 | 60-2,000 adults | A4i |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | passage | 2006 | 60-1,000 adults | A4i |
Common Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica | LC | passage | 2006 | 50-250 adults | A4i |
Pallas's Fish-eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus | EN | passage | 2006 | 2-7 adults | A1 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2006 | 5-60 adults | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2006 | present | A4iii |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2006 | very high | not assessed | not assessed |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | good |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target) | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | - | |
Desert | - | |
Forest | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
hunting | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Kagan Fish Farm. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 18/08/2022.