Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2000
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna | LC | winter | 1992 | 2,200 individuals | B1i |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta | LC | breeding | 1992 | 130 breeding pairs | B3 |
Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus | LC | breeding | 1999 | 25-60 breeding pairs | B2 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 1992 | 19-260 breeding pairs | B1i, B2 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | passage | 1999 | 100-5,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | breeding | 1999 | 300-2,500 breeding pairs | B1i |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis | LC | breeding | 1999 | 400-1,500 breeding pairs | B1i |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2013 | medium | not assessed | negligible |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | unset |
Accuracy of information | unknown |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | habitat shifting and alteration | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | dams & water management/use - abstraction of surface water (agricultural use) | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Sand dunes and beaches, Standing brackish and salt water, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Kuyal'nyts'kyj lyman. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 16/08/2022.