Data Zone
Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2007
Populations of IBA trigger speciesNote: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
| Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
| 2011 | very high | not assessed | medium |
| Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | unset |
| Accuracy of information | poor | ||
| Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
| Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
| Pollution | air-borne pollutants - type unknown/unrecorded | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
| Pollution | excess energy - noise pollution | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
| Pollution | garbage & solid waste | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
| Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
| Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Protection status:
| Protected Area | Designation | Area (ha) | Relationship with IBA | Overlap with IBA (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tapyta | Natural Private Reserve | 6,032 | is identical to site | 6,032 |
| Tapyta | Reserva Natural - Privado | 4,736 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
| San Rafael | Parque Nacional - Publico | 72,491 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
| Caazapa | Parque Nacional - Publico | 16,000 | protected area is adjacent to site | 0 |
| IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | Tropical semi-deciduous forest, Tropical semi-evergreen forest | - |
| Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
|---|---|
| agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2020) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Tapyta. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 20/09/2020.
