Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2006
Populations of IBA trigger speciesSpecies | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) of estimate | Population estimate | IBA Criteria Triggered |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula | LC | breeding | 1998 | 200-400 individuals | A4i |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | breeding | 1998 | 2-5 breeding pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | passage | 1993-1994 | 2-3 individuals | A1 |
Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola | CR | breeding | 1998 | 1,000-2,000 individuals | A1 |
Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2007 | high | favourable | negligible |
Was the whole site covered? | Yes | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | - |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | negligible |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Native coniferous, Flood-plain | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | - |
forestry | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
hunting | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Bobrovsko-Rasskazikhinskaya. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 07/02/2023.